Author |
Message |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:34 am |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
More noms. for best performance by inanimate object:
the baby in WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY
the baby's double in SHOOT 'EM UP (very obvious and very funny). |
|
|
Back to top |
|
lady wakasa |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:42 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 5911
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
|
It's a little early for this, but the Film Soc of Lincoln Center has announced it's showing Louise Brooks and Wallace Beery in Beggars of Life on 25 April. The Mont Alto Motion Picture Orchestra will accompany.

This is A Good Thing for several reasons.
1 - Beggars of Life has been out in a very bad, too-dark version from Grapevine for years. One or two years back, it was restored in what is rumored to be a beautiful spanking clean print (I've spoken *briefly* to someone who's seen it, so this isn't too far from the original source). This screening is of that restored print, which will be nice since the Grapevine version is literally too dark to make out in some spots.
2 - Screenings often mean a new dvd; it's a good way of letting the restorers know there's interest out there - if they're on the fence about it. (Like I need another dvd.)
3 - Mont Alto (or at least Rodney) are the folks behind the annual ams calendar, and to my knowledge rarely / never perform this far east (their base is in Colorado).
*~*~*~*~*~*
I've seen the Grapevine version (and read about the set shennanigans in several places) - it's a gritty little hobo story. I can't buy tickets yet, but I'm definitely going. |
_________________ ===================
http://www.wakasaworld.com |
|
Back to top |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:16 pm |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
|
Back to top |
|
inlareviewer |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:26 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 1949
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
mo_flixx wrote:
So can we have the Vanity Fair Oscar party? Well, we can, but they won't. Having officially shuttered the annual 'do, it's next to impossible for the magazine to reverse their decision at this late date.
http://theenvelope.latimes.com/env-vanityparty5feb05,0,7881375.story |
_________________ "And take extra care with strangers/Even flowers have their dangers/And though scary is exciting/Nice is different than good." --Stephen Sondheim |
|
Back to top |
|
carrobin |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:16 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 7795
Location: NYC
|
Synchronicity is a weird thing. I thought of Mike Leigh just because someone brought up the subject of British accents, and this afternoon I looked through the newspaper and found that a Mike Leigh play just opened at one of the little 42nd Street theaters ("Two Thousand Years," with Richard Masur and Natasha Lyonne). I didn't even know he wrote plays....
I'll mention this in the Theater forum too. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Trish |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:40 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 2438
Location: Massachusetts
|
In Style Magazine always has better photos - I hope their party is till on |
|
|
Back to top |
|
ehle64 |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:06 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 7149
Location: NYC; US&A
|
In Style has better photos than Vanity Fair??? Have you not seen the Hitchcock Spread they did for this years Hollywood Issue??? In Style?????????  |
_________________ It truly disappoints me when people do something for you via no prompt of your own and then use it as some kind of weapon against you at a later time and place. It is what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:30 pm |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
ehle64 wrote: In Style has better photos than Vanity Fair??? Have you not seen the Hitchcock Spread they did for this years Hollywood Issue??? In Style????????? 
Vanity Fair has better photos in general...but In Style does cover a party better. They include recipes, photos of food, the decor, place settings, etc.
Don't forget those little gold foil wrapped chocolate Oscars and my $40,000 goodie bag.
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
carrobin |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:50 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 7795
Location: NYC
|
Darn, I was working for the wrong magazines at Time Inc. (Money, Mutual Funds, Real Simple.) But at least we got InStyle for free. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Syd |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:26 pm |
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 12921
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
|
inlareviewer wrote: SASSY love for Mrs. Gummer notwithstanding, would have tended more toward, oh, Patricia Routledge, or Margo Martindale, or Sophie Thompson. Or John C. Reilly, to say nothing of Dan Aykroyd, who still owns the role. "Save your liver!" However, always good to have more Merylity on the horizon.
I couldn't place Margo Martindale, then ran across her in the last story in Paris, Je T'Aime. You're right, she could do a great Julia Child. |
_________________ I had a love and my love was true but I lost my love to the yabba dabba doo, --The Flintstone Lament |
|
Back to top |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:46 pm |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
Syd wrote: inlareviewer wrote: SASSY love for Mrs. Gummer notwithstanding, would have tended more toward, oh, Patricia Routledge, or Margo Martindale, or Sophie Thompson. Or John C. Reilly, to say nothing of Dan Aykroyd, who still owns the role. "Save your liver!" However, always good to have more Merylity on the horizon.
I couldn't place Margo Martindale, then ran across her in the last story in Paris, Je T'Aime. You're right, she could do a great Julia Child.
She played John C. Reilly's mother in WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY.
I think she'd make a perfect Julia Child. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Syd |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:51 pm |
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 12921
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
|
mo_flixx wrote: Syd wrote: inlareviewer wrote: SASSY love for Mrs. Gummer notwithstanding, would have tended more toward, oh, Patricia Routledge, or Margo Martindale, or Sophie Thompson. Or John C. Reilly, to say nothing of Dan Aykroyd, who still owns the role. "Save your liver!" However, always good to have more Merylity on the horizon.
I couldn't place Margo Martindale, then ran across her in the last story in Paris, Je T'Aime. You're right, she could do a great Julia Child.
She played John C. Reilly's mother in WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY.
I think she'd make a perfect Julia Child.
She was also Hilary Swank's mother in Million Dollar Baby and had a part in Iron-Jawed Angels. I see her a lot; I just have trouble placing her name. |
_________________ I had a love and my love was true but I lost my love to the yabba dabba doo, --The Flintstone Lament |
|
Back to top |
|
Nancy |
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:57 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 4607
Location: Norman, OK
|
mo_flixx wrote: Don't forget those little gold foil wrapped chocolate Oscars and my $40,000 goodie bag.

This time of year, I always look forward to the gold-foil-wrapped chocolate Blanches. It just wouldn't be Blanche without them. |
_________________ "All in all, it's just another feather in the fan."
Isaacism, 2009 |
|
Back to top |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:00 am |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
re: FOOL'S GOLD.
I heard a critic's comment on the radio today saying Mathew McConnaughey (sp?) is upstaged by his abs. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Marj |
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:53 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 10497
Location: Manhattan
|
ehle64 wrote: In Style has better photos than Vanity Fair??? Have you not seen the Hitchcock Spread they did for this years Hollywood Issue??? In Style????????? 
Speaking of which, [drum roll, please] here are Is the Hitchcock spread from Vanity Fair.
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/20148385.html |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|