Author |
Message |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:29 am |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
lady wakasa wrote: So Mama Wakasa and I finally caught Casino Royale. I thought it started a little slow, but got pretty interesting as time went on. I haven't seen the 1967 version in a loooong time, so don't have any basis for comparison, so I'd like to rewatch that. (I really don't remember the storyline - I just remember David Niven and the music - so I'm feeling old about it.) In addition, I'd like to read the book (which I never have).
(I don't think this is a spoiler, but who knows...)
But I have to take exception to describing that one scene as "homoerotic sadomasochistic torture." (Especially since I spent an aggravating 2-1/2 weeks trying to convince my mother she didn't want to go.) That really came across as torture, pure and simple. There were two men in a room. One was naked. The other was wailing on him. The naked one made jokes to poke at his torturer. Neither was getting off on this.
Fortunately Mama Wakasa laughed at the jokes (which were funny), so I knew she was okay with it.
I'm glad that Mama Wakasa enjoyed the Bond movie.
The point I was making about the "homoerotic aspects" of the torture sequence was that I felt certain _audience members_ might find it erotic. Certainly, the nudity of Craig and the way his body is shot could be construed as erotic (or homoerotic).
In that cold blue light, I thought his body looked like a fine sculpture.
To be precise: sadistic, yes; masochistic, no. See post below for what I wrote.
[BTW, I often think one sees what one wants to see in a film. Others might not see the same implications another person would.] |
Last edited by mo_flixx on Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:41 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
smoot |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 am |
|
|
Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 11
|
billyweeds wrote: And an important element...is the charismatic performance in the lead role by stunningly handsome and compelling Rudy Youngblood.
I totally agree. All of the performances were great, especially when most of the cast were non-actors doing very convincing acting. That's how it seemed, anyway. One of the most moving performances, I thought, was by the guy (I can't remember the character's name) who played one of the hunters in Jaguar Paw's tribe; he was a bigger guy, and had the fertility issues. He was good in the early scenes in which he was being teased by the other members of the tribe, and then later on in the movie, his expressions of grief/rage/helplessness while shackled and witnessing the ravaging of the village just made that whole devastating sequence really hit home. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
mo_flixx |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:38 am |
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 12533
|
[quote="mo_flixxTake it from me, don't take Mama Wakasa to SHORTBUS.
The homoerotic scene (actually quite yummy for either sex - that is straight women or gay men) from CASINO ROYALE is a bit much - but maybe it's best not to bring this up beforehand.[/quote]
This is what I wrote back then... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
lady wakasa |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:50 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 5911
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
|
I didn't say it was specifically you, Mo. That's actually a combination of a couple of different reviews. |
_________________ ===================
http://www.wakasaworld.com |
|
Back to top |
|
ehle64 |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:53 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 7149
Location: NYC; US&A
|
All I know is, I'm a big fag, think Daniel Craig is superfine, and found not one thing erotic about that scene. |
_________________ It truly disappoints me when people do something for you via no prompt of your own and then use it as some kind of weapon against you at a later time and place. It is what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:48 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
smoot wrote: billyweeds wrote: And an important element...is the charismatic performance in the lead role by stunningly handsome and compelling Rudy Youngblood.
I totally agree. All of the performances were great, especially when most of the cast were non-actors doing very convincing acting. That's how it seemed, anyway. One of the most moving performances, I thought, was by the guy (I can't remember the character's name) who played one of the hunters in Jaguar Paw's tribe; he was a bigger guy, and had the fertility issues. He was good in the early scenes in which he was being teased by the other members of the tribe, and then later on in the movie, his expressions of grief/rage/helplessness while shackled and witnessing the ravaging of the village just made that whole devastating sequence really hit home.
smoot--That guy was superb (should check out his name, but the characters are hard to differentiate), as were Jaguar Paw's dad, his son, and the head villain. All so well chosen, and the camera adored them. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:26 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
New York Film Critics have chosen United 93 as Best Picture, Jackie Earle Haley (Little Children) as Supporting Actor, and Jennifer Hudson (Dreamgirls) as Supporting Actress. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:29 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
Furest Whitaker as Best Actor (with runner-ups Ryan Gosling and Sacha Baron Cohen). |
|
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:45 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
Helen Mirren as Best Actress. Whitaker and Mirren are now only one major critics' circle award away from a total, absolute clean sweep of all the award givers. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
chillywilly |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:07 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 8251
Location: Salt Lake City
|
ehle64 wrote: All I know is, I'm a big fag, think Daniel Craig is superfine, and found not one thing erotic about that scene.
Straight or gay, I really didn't see anything erotic about that scene. I just viewed it as an extreme form of torture that Bond is not normally subjected to. |
_________________ Chilly
"If you should die before me / Ask if you could bring a friend" |
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:11 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
Not a whiff of sex in the whole scene. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
inlareviewer |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:20 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 1949
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
billyweeds wrote: New York Film Critics have chosen United 93 as Best Picture, Jackie Earle Haley (Little Children) as Supporting Actor, and Jennifer Hudson (Dreamgirls) as Supporting Actress.
(insert clappy sounds and foot stomps here) |
_________________ "And take extra care with strangers/Even flowers have their dangers/And though scary is exciting/Nice is different than good." --Stephen Sondheim |
|
Back to top |
|
inlareviewer |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:52 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 1949
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Marj wrote: InLA my sweet,
You won't believe this but I just came back from YouTube and listened to both Jennifers. I understand Jennifer Holliday was only 21 when she played Effie. I wonder what happened to her.
Hudson is all the buzz for a best suporting and Beyonce is being so sweet. Riiigght!
And what's the problem with Jennifer C's eyebrows? They look fine to me.
Marj, mon petit, just caught this. Jennifer Holliday is still recording and concertizing, albeit more sporadically than in the 80s and 90s. She did a very effective Ally McBeal a half decade or so ago, and does many GLBT benefits and such. She's the berries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Holliday
As for Beyonce's alleged sweetness, that's not what the location director, an intimate, indicated. She was late to the first day of shooting because of a press junket in NYC (which, admittedly, was more her manager and handler's faux pas), and it set a tone of star behavior for the shoot that seldom subsided, with Mssrs. Foxx and Murphy not exactly above such pyrotechnics. "It's all up to Condon's editing," said my colleague..."That shoot was a nightmare of egos." Except Baby Jen Hudson, whom he found adorable, clearly thrilled to be around Beyonce and Murphy and Jamie and Anika, etc.
As for Ms. Connelly, there's nothing wrong with her eyebrows, but throughout Little Children they transfixed me, so I wondered if anyone knew what was up with them. It was sort of a joke. |
Last edited by inlareviewer on Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:55 pm; edited 1 time in total _________________ "And take extra care with strangers/Even flowers have their dangers/And though scary is exciting/Nice is different than good." --Stephen Sondheim |
|
Back to top |
|
Joe Vitus |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:55 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 14498
Location: Houston
|
Billy,
Has Dreamgirls opened in New York already? I've heard nothing about it. How can a performance win in a movie not yet released? |
_________________ You've got a great brain. You should keep it in your head.
-Topher |
|
Back to top |
|
inlareviewer |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:56 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 1949
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Joe Vitus wrote: Billy,
Has Dreamgirls opened in New York already? I've heard nothing about it. How can a performance win in a movie not yet released?
By being advance screened for the press.
http://www.broadway.com/Gen/Buzz_Photo_op.aspx?ci=541243
Oh, my, am so full of antihistamines I didn't even notice this was boldly addressed to Billy, not me, so my apologies to Mr. Weeds (hey, Billy, when am I going to see you guesting on the Showtime series? Billyweeds does Weeds, am so there), and I'm going back and sit in my own little corner in my own little chair...(insert laughing out loud and sneezy emoticons) |
_________________ "And take extra care with strangers/Even flowers have their dangers/And though scary is exciting/Nice is different than good." --Stephen Sondheim |
|
Back to top |
|
|