Third Eye Film Society Forum Index
Author Message

<  Third Eye Film Forums  ~  Current Film Talk

billyweeds
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 5:50 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
marantzo wrote:
I saw The Adjustment Bureau. It was OK but I wasn't too impressed. Damon was good in his role and the visuals were good.


Can't believe you weren't blown away by Emily Blunt, and by her chemistry with Damon. This was everything Duplicity wasn't.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
marantzo
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 6:56 pm Reply with quote
Guest
I never saw Duplicity. Emily Blunt was good, but I never got into their romance. They just didn't seem to me like they would be a credible couple. I found the movie pretty shallow and lacking punch. I didn't regret seeing it. I had no problem sitting through it, but I guess it just didn't involve me emotionally. It seemed like a sci fi chick flick. Smile
daffy
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:07 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 1939 Location: Wall Street
Hey, I actually saw a movie in the theater!

Water for Elephants = The Notebook with animals and Hans Landa, but none of Gosling and McAdams' chemistry.

That's about it.

_________________
"I have been known, on occasion, to howl at the moon."

http://www.rugbyworldcup.com/index.html
View user's profile Send private message
marantzo
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:29 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Nice to see you visit, daffy.
Marc
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 1:08 am Reply with quote
Joined: 19 May 2004 Posts: 8424
Quote:
They just didn't seem to me like they would be a credible couple.


Exactly. I didn't buy that relationship at all.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bartist
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:03 am Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Apr 2010 Posts: 6958 Location: Black Hills
daffy wrote:
Hey, I actually saw a movie in the theater!

Water for Elephants = The Notebook with animals and Hans Landa, but none of Gosling and McAdams' chemistry.

That's about it.


In the book, the owner was Jewish, so the choice of Chris Waltz to play him was an interesting one. I was pretty "meh" about the movie, too.

_________________
He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days.
View user's profile Send private message
carrobin
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:03 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
Well, my 91-year-old mother and my sister and I went to see "Bridesmaids" while I was in South Carolina, and we all loved it. My sister tried to get her husband to come along but he grumped that he wasn't going to see any movie called "Bridesmaids." When she tells him more about it, though, maybe he will. (Odd that Jon Hamm was uncredited. I had to check IMDb for the cast because people were leaving the theater in front of me when the list came onscreen.)
View user's profile Send private message
billyweeds
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:51 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
Carol--Often, actors would rather be unbilled than take the lower billing the role would require. At this point in his career, Hamm would probably prefer to be seen as "doing the filmmakers a favor" by appearing unbilled than to take fourth or fifth billing.

He was hilarious, anyway.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
carrobin
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:22 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
Hamm's role in "Bridesmaids" was too true--what some women will put up with just because the guy is gorgeous!
View user's profile Send private message
marantzo
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:54 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Just got back from Source Code. I liked it more than TAB. SC held my interest much more and the, sort of, love story made sense in a paranormal kind of way. Both films had similar rap-ups but I was moved a lot by SC's and not moved a whole lot by TAB's.

Some gorgeous shots of Chicago.
billyweeds
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:10 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
carrobin wrote:
Hamm's role in "Bridesmaids" was too true--what some women will put up with just because the guy is gorgeous!


Word. And Hamm is (and has been for some time now) willing to send up his own dreamboat image in seditious ways unknown outside of George Clooney--and Hamm has even trumped Clooney in the "I can play sleazy" sweepstakes.

Exhibit B: the "John Ham" sketch on SNL.

Exhibit C: his character on 30 Rock.

Exhibit A for the time being is Bridesmaids.

The guy is becoming one of my heroes.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
marantzo
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:29 am Reply with quote
Guest
The new X Men (a prequel) has been getting rave reviews from every critic I've read, in entirety or capsule. The reviews of The Tree of Life tend to all say that it is wonderful and terrible in equal measure.
bartist
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:40 am Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Apr 2010 Posts: 6958 Location: Black Hills
The X-Men franchise bores my tits off. Tree of Life seems to be limited release in the U.S. and I wonder if it'll make it from Boston to Stixville. I think the distributors look at stuff from Cannes and then at the heartland and say "hmmmm...." and then flip a coin. Ten years ago, the mere presence of Pitt would have made the coin unnecessary. Personally, I'm glad to see him continue to evolve beyond heartthrob. (though, to be fair, I guess he was on his way with roles as far back as Snatch and Kalifornia...)

_________________
He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days.
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Vitus
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:45 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 14498 Location: Houston
No interest in the new X-Men here, either. A reboot is pretty stupid, especially so soon. But then, I'm a superhero fan who doesn't much care for superhero movies.

_________________
You've got a great brain. You should keep it in your head.

-Topher
View user's profile Send private message
billyweeds
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:14 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
Of all the superhero franchises, none of which exactly knock my socks off (except for the first two Spider-Men), X-Men is the least interesting to me of them all.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2591 of 3196
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 2590, 2591, 2592 ... 3194, 3195, 3196  Next
Post new topic

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum