Third Eye Film Society Forum Index
Author Message

<  Third Eye Film Forums  ~  Current Film Talk

marantzo
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:04 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Marj, why would think Billy might not be interested in the subject matter of a movie about Charlie Chaplin? It's not like he's a Gen Xer or something. Laughing

On a related topic., one of the channels here tends to show old B/W movies, and silents, when they aren't broadcasting some Spanish programmes that I've never been able to understand. Laurel and Hardy, Abbot and Costello, old B/W dramas etc. The last couple of weeks they have been showing hours of Chaplin shorts back to back and features like The Gold Rush. These are usually through the late night and when I wake up in the middle of the night (which is always) I tune into this channel first. Often get lucky and have seen among other things, Chaplin shorts which I watch until I fall asleep again. A very interesting channel.
marantzo
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:12 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Having just read Billy's last post, yeah, see it, it's a good movie. Not a borefest as Attenborough's tend to be. I saw Gandhi long after it's release and wondered what all the fuss was about. Too long and too dull.
Syd
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:33 pm Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 12921 Location: Norman, Oklahoma
"An Education" and "Crazy Heart" are both showing in Norman starting Friday. No sign of single or serious men.

_________________
I had a love and my love was true but I lost my love to the yabba dabba doo, --The Flintstone Lament
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
carrobin
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:37 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
We saw "Gandhi" for our film class at 8:30 in the morning, which meant I had to be at the Ziegfeld Theatre at 7:30. I figured maybe that's why I was getting sleepy by the end of the film, but I didn't really find it boring. Sir Richard "Dickie" Attenborough was there to talk about it, and the main thing I remember was that some woman had told him to use "a moving light" to represent Gandhi rather than a mere human actor, and he told her crisply that "I'm not making a film about Tinkerbell."
View user's profile Send private message
whiskeypriest
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:39 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
carrobin wrote:
We saw "Gandhi" for our film class at 8:30 in the morning, which meant I had to be at the Ziegfeld Theatre at 7:30. I figured maybe that's why I was getting sleepy by the end of the film, but I didn't really find it boring. Sir Richard "Dickie" Attenborough was there to talk about it, and the main thing I remember was that some woman had told him to use "a moving light" to represent Gandhi rather than a mere human actor, and he told her crisply that "I'm not making a film about Tinkerbell."
Actually, that might of been more interesting than the stolid, respectful and lifeless thing he made instead.

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
jeremy
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:37 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6794 Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
The best thing about Sherlock Holmes was the two leads and their on-screen chemistry. I have no idea if they got on off-screen.

Rober Downey Jr has rightly been praised for his steam-punk, portrayal of the eponymous detective, but I also think Jude Law's understated Watson was excellent. Jude Law is always better in a support role. Incidentally, his characterisation of Watson, was much more in keeping with the uncompromising military man of Conan Doyle's writings than the amiable duffer that has become the popular image.

I would have liked more deductive reasoning and less action; a credible plot and a different lead actress; but those quibbles aside, the film was still an enjoyable diversion.

_________________
I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
jeremy
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:39 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6794 Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
Richard Attenborough is too nice to be a good director.

_________________
I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
marantzo
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:13 pm Reply with quote
Guest
jeremy wrote:
Richard Attenborough is too nice to be a good director.


You might have a good point there.
Marj
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:23 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 10497 Location: Manhattan
Gary: Billy answered for me. I know he doesn't like Attenborough. Frankly, neither do I. And the film his long and a very typical biopic with one exception: Downey Jr.'s performance.

And I think Jeremy has a point. Attenborough may indeed be too nice to be a director.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
carrobin
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:40 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
I've always liked Attenborough as an actor (after all, "The Great Escape" is one of my top five favorite films). But as a director he usually leans toward the pretentious.
View user's profile Send private message
jeremy
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:08 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6794 Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
David Attenborough is a grande dame [sic] of British cinema and numbered among the great and good. Along with the likes of Alan Bennet and Stephen Fry, he generates the type of fussy affection that can lead to someone being labelled a national institution. Much like his films, he is amiable, worthy and not a little earnest. Though normally seen as virtues rather than faults, his instinct to be inclusive, his desire to be liked and his inability to see the worst in people, do not make for lean or edgy filmmaking.

He is also a Chelsea supporter.

[Correction: Richard not David...damn!]


Last edited by jeremy on Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:56 pm; edited 1 time in total

_________________
I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
chillywilly
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:21 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 8251 Location: Salt Lake City
billyweeds wrote:
Haven't seen The Soloist, though I fear I might have to after the recent raves on this forum, but Less Than Zero remains my favorite Downey, with Iron Man an incredibly close second.

If it wasn't for The Soloist, Iron Man - which was my favorite film of 2008 - would have been in that top 3 list.

I need to watch Less Than Zero again. A good movie with a great screenplay by Brett Easton Ellis and a superb RDJ performance.

_________________
Chilly
"If you should die before me / Ask if you could bring a friend"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Melody
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:15 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 2242 Location: TX
I haven't seen Chaplin, either, and now I really want to. Thanks for the reminder!

See The Soloist sometime for another great RDJ performance. Good screenplay, too.

_________________
My heart told my head: This time, no.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ehle64
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:23 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 7149 Location: NYC; US&A
uhm, , i remember Chaplin being awesome.
i also remember da Weeds disliking Home for the Holidays (I love it, his performanace (which i feel to be me)) plus the WHOLE cast.

anywho -- i couldn't stand Iron Man, so what do I knkow?
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Syd
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:34 am Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 12921 Location: Norman, Oklahoma
jeremy wrote:
David Attenborough is a grande dame [sic] of British cinema and numbered among the great and good. Along with the likes of Alan Bennet and Stephen Fry, he generates the type of fussy affection that can lead to someone being labelled a national institution. Much like his films, he is amiable, worthy and not a little earnest. Though normally seen as virtues rather than faults, his instinct to be inclusive, his desire to be liked and his inability to see the worst in people, do not make for lean or edgy filmmaking.

He is also a Chelsea supporter.


David should be a national institution. Life on Earth The Living Planet, The Life of Mammals, etc., are classics of natural history. I much prefer him to Richard.

_________________
I had a love and my love was true but I lost my love to the yabba dabba doo, --The Flintstone Lament
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2344 of 3196
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 2343, 2344, 2345 ... 3194, 3195, 3196  Next
Post new topic

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum