Author |
Message |
|
ehle64 |
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:55 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 7149
Location: NYC; US&A
|
Joe Vitus wrote: I think it depends on whether he likes the person making the comment or not, rather than if the comment itself is wrong.
Uhm, you think wrong.
Did you notice me not expound on what I felt after reading gromit's explicit response and said what he meant? The comment itself was flippant and offensive to me. The backing up of it made perfect sense so I saw no reason to go anywhere further with it. That you did is typical. You have a really hard time of letting things go. |
_________________ It truly disappoints me when people do something for you via no prompt of your own and then use it as some kind of weapon against you at a later time and place. It is what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
ehle64 |
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:59 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 7149
Location: NYC; US&A
|
marj -- I didn't remember that you wrote a review on War of the Worlds, too. I purposefully didn't read it because I don't usually read reviews of films I haven't seen.
I wish I had the talent and the time to write a review of Walk The Line that would do it justice. I liked the film that much.
More kudos to the great writers on our site. If there are any lurkers out there reading these posts, do yourselves a favor and be sure to visit our Film Review section. |
_________________ It truly disappoints me when people do something for you via no prompt of your own and then use it as some kind of weapon against you at a later time and place. It is what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
Marj |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:54 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 10497
Location: Manhattan
|
Quote: marj -- I didn't remember that you wrote a review on War of the Worlds, too. I purposefully didn't read it because I don't usually read reviews of films I haven't seen.
Wade - I try not to read reviews before seeing movies either. But you can bet after seeing a film, I do. Especially those that have been written on Third Eye. It's part of the fun of taking part ...
Btw, young man your review of Grey Gardens was very good! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Joe Vitus |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:22 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 14498
Location: Houston
|
Quote: You have a really hard time of letting things go.
Nope, I just recognize your inconsistency. |
_________________ You've got a great brain. You should keep it in your head.
-Topher |
|
Back to top |
|
Joe Vitus |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:45 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 14498
Location: Houston
|
But I shouldn't have posted that response because it's not a huge deal to me, and I really don't mean to provoke an argument between us. Sorry. Forget about it. Have a good night. |
_________________ You've got a great brain. You should keep it in your head.
-Topher |
|
Back to top |
|
Shane |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:19 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 1168
Location: Chicago
|
ehle you are so right about the 4 movie marathon!! It was real fun. never Ms.Holliday was such a treat. Jack wasn't bad but I just couldn't stand it that they wrote his role so abrasively and narrowand asside from it being shot in the 50's there wasn't an excuse for him. Of course the city was an important cast member here. I never tire of glimpses of our metropolitian past Marilyn was right on about all of them being unique to themselves. Sense and Sensibility was beatiful, location-wise that is. Hugh Grant was painful to watch with that bend to his body whenever he showed up. Everyones electricity just made it glow. It deserves much more than I'm giving it here but I figure most off ya'll are just yawning and saying something about my tardiness in finding these gems. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
billyweeds |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:31 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 20618
Location: New York City
|
Shane wrote: ehle you are so right about the 4 movie marathon!! It was real fun. never Ms.Holliday was such a treat. Jack wasn't bad but I just couldn't stand it that they wrote his role so abrasively and narrowand asside from it being shot in the 50's there wasn't an excuse for him.
I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about. I thought Lemmon's performance (his debut film, btw) was one of the supreme comic performances of the 1950s, and that the chemistry he and Holliday demonstrated puts nearly all other movie couples in the shade. The only ones that compare IMO are Stewart and Kelly in Rear Window, Tracy and Hepburn in Adam's Rib, and Bogart and Bergman in Casablanca. The fact that Lemmon could be so superb first time out of the box was proof positive that he had a major movie career in store. And the evidence is happily there for all to see. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Trish |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:51 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 2438
Location: Massachusetts
|
Befade wrote: "Last Tango in Paris bored me more thoroughly and profoundly than any other film in memory."
That's too bad.
Last Tango is a brilliant film dealing with GRIEF. Marlon Brando, after his wife's suicide, is at a loss to find any reason to live.
Bertolucci is using Brando's sexuality as an expression of his anger at his wife and his desire to find love of his own life.
SPOILERS: By the end of the movie.........Brando wants to love this girl.....he wants to know her name. But Bertolucci doesn't do Hollywood endings (watch Besieged) and the girl thought this was just a sex thing and freaks out...........shooting him.
Wow, I was sure I watched that film - through till the end - I don't remember that ending |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Trish |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:57 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 2438
Location: Massachusetts
|
lady wakasa wrote: Mr. Brownstone wrote: Currently watching Hotel Rwanda. Expecting nightmares for days.
I left the theater after Hotel Rwanda with a woman in front of me crying and asking her companion why no one knew what was going on in 1994. That really, really pissed me off (well, I was already pretty pissed off after sitting through the movie) because I knew very well what was going on in 1994, I discussed it with a number of people in 1994, and the information was there - if she had bothered to look. (One big problem was that the Clinton Adminstration was afraid that if the situation was declared a genocide, there would be some legal obligation to do something - so they dragged their feet. Now things get declared genocides - with no clear legal obligation, so no one does anything. Nothing learned there.)
Oh this film was tame tame tame tame - compared to a cable film that came out before it - called Sometimes in April
here's a link at imdb for it if anyone is interested http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0400063/[/b] |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Trish |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:58 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 2438
Location: Massachusetts
|
|
Back to top |
|
Marilyn |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:08 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 8210
Location: Skokie (not a bad movie, btw)
|
ehle64 wrote: Ahhhh, It Should Happen To You is one of my favorite movies. Judy Holliday is a Goddess!
p.s. congratulations on a movie-marathon Sunday. I used to be able to sit through 4 films at a time, but now I can only do about 2, tops.
Actually, it went on even longer, with a viewing of Safety Last! on Harold Lloyd night. With my bum ankle, there was no way I was venturing further than my own home (and am cane-free today as a result!). To have that wealth of wonderful films, each special in its own way, to pass the time with was more than I could have hoped for. I was particularly pleased that Shane, resistant at first to Sense and Sensibility, ended up raving about its virtues by the end. It is my favorite Austen screen adaptation, so that was very gratifying.
Safety Last! was a bit of a disappointment on second viewing. It really is just a stunt film, rather like a Keystone Kops film, but not as manic. I admire Lloyd's dexterity in the apartment and department store scenes, but there really wasn't much to the film. I didn't find the climb up the building to be either funny or frightening, though it is original. |
_________________ http://ferdyonfilms.com |
|
Back to top |
|
Marilyn |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:13 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 8210
Location: Skokie (not a bad movie, btw)
|
billyweeds wrote: Shane wrote: ehle you are so right about the 4 movie marathon!! It was real fun. never Ms.Holliday was such a treat. Jack wasn't bad but I just couldn't stand it that they wrote his role so abrasively and narrowand asside from it being shot in the 50's there wasn't an excuse for him.
I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about. I thought Lemmon's performance (his debut film, btw) was one of the supreme comic performances of the 1950s, and that the chemistry he and Holliday demonstrated puts nearly all other movie couples in the shade. The only ones that compare IMO are Stewart and Kelly in Rear Window, Tracy and Hepburn in Adam's Rib, and Bogart and Bergman in Casablanca. The fact that Lemmon could be so superb first time out of the box was proof positive that he had a major movie career in store. And the evidence is happily there for all to see.
What we were talking about was Pete's insistence on labeling Gladys' behavior as wacky and something she shouldn't do. She very rightly says to him at one point, "I don't tell you what to do with your money." That she comes to realize that fame for its own sake is nothing still does not give Pete the right to moan about how she has no time for him because of the billboards and that it's all silly. It made her feel great, so I guess it served a purpose and helped her outgrow her simple desire to be known.
Jack, of course, was wonderful. When I had heard of the wealth of stage and television experience (over 200 parts) he had before making his big screen debut, it's not hard to see why he triumphed so completely. |
_________________ http://ferdyonfilms.com |
|
Back to top |
|
Mr. Brownstone |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:20 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 2450
|
Joe,
Context is everything, though. I lived in a fraternity in college. We were pulling pranks on each other all the time. I once had to go to class covered in baked bean juice and mustard. It was disgusting. My best friends did it to me, so it was funny.
Another time, when I was taking a shower early in the morning, a guy dumped a huge pail of cold water on me. The guy who did it was not a friend of mine; we tended not to associate much with each other. I was livid and nearly killed the guy.
See the difference? |
_________________ "My name is Gunnery Sergeant Major Highway. And I have drunk more beer, pissed more blood, banged more quiff and knocked more skulls than all you numbnuts put together." - Clint Eastwood, Heartbreak Ridge |
|
Back to top |
|
Shane |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:22 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 1168
Location: Chicago
|
You're right Billy you have no idea what i'm talking about. It was his dynamic acting that brought out the holes in the writing so clearly. I felt he should have been given a less two-dimensional role of paranoid egoist clashing with a geniune person who considers a search for self something yet to be written. Her complex persona was enough of a challange for anyone she encountered. I find it difficult to believe she would give him more than a second try, after all she is always going to be rushing headlong into life full of enthusium, while he has to pratically back into a room he's so careful about whats around him and why. Then again they might make a perfect team. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Shane |
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:25 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 1168
Location: Chicago
|
Hi Sweetie!! We both seem to be addressing the same misunderstanding again. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|