Third Eye Film Society Forum Index
Author Message

<  Third Eye Film Forums  ~  Couch With A View

yambu
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:35 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 23 May 2004 Posts: 6441 Location: SF Bay Area
spoiler response to Befade and Lunchbox:

[color]"Sometimes the wrong train leads you to the right station."

When they finally decide to meet, he backs out. Then and later, he knows that overcoming her bad marriage, her raising a young child, and his old age would be too much for a future together.

I got confused about their rail journeys. It seems they were passing each other. He took a look at his retirement town and went back to work. She pursued the meeting but, of course, she would be disappointed.

I think their extraordinary friendship was to equip him for dealing with retirement or no, now that he could see people more for what they are; and her for caring for herself and her child.[color=white]


Last edited by yambu on Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gromit
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:37 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 9016 Location: Shanghai
Maybe someone who knows classical music better than I can answer a question for me. In Possessed, Schumann's Carnaval, Opus 9 is used at least twice in the film and is essentially "their song." Both times I heard it it seemed to have echoes of a familiar jazz standard. I'm terrible at recalling one song while another is playing, but I think the echoes I was hearing were of We'll Meet Again.
Any thoughts?
Do these two pieces have any connection, overlap, relationship?

_________________
Killing your enemies, if it's done badly, increases their number.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
whiskeypriest
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:09 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
Finally caight up woth the Whedon version of Much Ado. Nice effort. Was reminded how essential it is to have appealing actors as Benedict and Beatrice, not jist becaise they are the money roles, but because their romance distracts from the fact that Claudio is one of the most repulsive romantic heroes in literatire and the Prince scarcely better.

Anyway, Denisof and Acker gave good performamces. Not say Emma Thompson good (if such a thing is possible without actually being Emma Thompson. Oh, Emma, Emma, Emma!) But maybe Branagh good, and without the oh so romantic.slo mo rips from a 1980s Massngill commercial. Fillion made a decent Dogberry, though I admit a fondness for Mochael Keaton shared by few. Kranz and Morgese were rather anonymois in thankless roles. Kranz never made me give a damn about Claudio but I think that may be beyond the capabilities of most - perhaps all - actors. Enjoyable, the cast did a noce job with verse speak. Translated well enough to modern dress.
L

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
marantzo
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:11 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Gromit, I had heard Carnaval Opus 9 a few times but it was like 50 or more years ago that I listened to it. I checked out a site that had it and I listened to it (I actually bounce ahead, [it's a half hour piece]). Here is the site,

https://archive.org/details/SchumannCarnavalOpus9

I don't really connect it to Jazz. Laughing
marantzo
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:16 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Whiskey, I'm pretty well in sync with your review of Much Ado... I'm a big Michael Keaton fan also.
whiskeypriest
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:39 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
Finally caight up woth the Whedon version of Much Ado. Nice effort. Was reminded how essential it is to have appealing actors as Benedict and Beatrice, not jist becaise they are the money roles, but because their romance distracts from the fact that Claudio is one of the most repulsive romantic heroes in literatire and the Prince scarcely better.

Anyway, Denisof and Acker gave good performamces. Not say Emma Thompson good (if such a thing is possible without actually being Emma Thompson. Oh, Emma, Emma, Emma!) But maybe Branagh good, and without the oh so romantic.slo mo rips from a 1980s Massngill commercial. Fillion made a decent Dogberry, though I admit a fondness for Mochael Keaton shared by few. Kranz and Morgese were rather anonymois in thankless roles. Kranz never made me give a damn about Claudio but I think that may be beyond the capabilities of most - perhaps all - actors. Enjoyable, the cast did a noce job with verse speak. Translated well enough to modern dress.
L

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
billyweeds
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:56 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
whiskeypriest wrote:
I admit a fondness for Michael Keaton shared by few.


Whoa there, hoss! Where do you get that your Keaton fandom is "shared by few"? He happens to be one of my all-time favorite movie stars, and I know many people who agree. Keaton may be a cult figure, but it's a pretty large cult.

1988 was, to be fair, his peak year, with the incredbly contrasting but equally great performances in Beetlejuice and Clean and Sober. But he's coming back in Birdman. Wait for it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
yambu
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:01 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 23 May 2004 Posts: 6441 Location: SF Bay Area
whiskeypriest wrote:
Finally caight up woth the Whedon version of Much Ado. Nice effort. Was reminded how essential it is to have appealing actors as Benedict and Beatrice, not jist becaise they are the money roles, but because their romance distracts from the fact that Claudio is one of the most repulsive romantic heroes in literatire and the Prince scarcely better.

Anyway, Denisof and Acker gave good performamces. Not say Emma Thompson good (if such a thing is possible without actually being Emma Thompson. Oh, Emma, Emma, Emma!) But maybe Branagh good, and without the oh so romantic.slo mo rips from a 1980s Massngill commercial. Fillion made a decent Dogberry, though I admit a fondness for Mochael Keaton shared by few. Kranz and Morgese were rather anonymois in thankless roles. Kranz never made me give a damn about Claudio but I think that may be beyond the capabilities of most - perhaps all - actors. Enjoyable, the cast did a noce job with verse speak. Translated well enough to modern dress.
L
I enjoyed both, so I hate to compare them, because when I do, Branagh steps forth as far superior. With a great line like "There's a double meaning in that", Branagh, chest high, takes a long pause, and delivers it into the eyes of those watching. It's what he does in all of Shakespeare. He throws not a single line away.

"Sigh No More, Ladies" appears in the Whedon version as a short, jazzy instrumental. In the Branagh film it is sung three times and stitches together the action with some verse from the play:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boNnrv0CGzU
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
carrobin
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:34 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
i liked the Branagh/Thompson/Keaton "Much Ado," and loved the Whedon version. Of course my favorite is still the stage version with Alan Bates and Felicity Kendal, which I saw four times in three days on a rush trip to London. (During the Saturday matinee, Don John had a coughing fit he couldn't control, and his minions kept his lines going among them--the perils of being an actor!) Of course Claudio is a creep--I thoroughly agreed with Beatrice.
View user's profile Send private message
billyweeds
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:15 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
I've seen Much Ado more times than I can remember, many more times than any other Shakespeare play. (And I've been in it twice.) I thought the Whedon version was one of the weakest I've seen. I loved the Branagh version except for Denzel. But neither film rivals the magic of the play on stage.

Best of them all was the astounding John Gielgud-Margaret Leighton version, but Katharine Hepburn's Beatrice, in which she appeared to be channeling Lucy Ricardo, was right up there. Seen it and seen it and would love to see it again.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
whiskeypriest
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:18 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
billyweeds wrote:
whiskeypriest wrote:
I admit a fondness for Michael Keaton shared by few.


Whoa there, hoss! Where do you get that your Keaton fandom is "shared by few"? He happens to be one of my all-time favorite movie stars, and I know many people who agree. Keaton may be a cult figure, but it's a pretty large cult.

1988 was, to be fair, his peak year, with the incredbly contrasting but equally great performances in Beetlejuice and Clean and Sober. But he's coming back in Birdman. Wait for it.
I am aware of your entorely jistifoed Mochael Keaton fandom. My pointt was if you look at people.generally you"ll find a lot of people find it discordant. I think he is tje second best thing in the movie after Emma. Emma! Emma! OH BUT I LOVE EMMA!

Cannot wait.for.Birdman.

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
whiskeypriest
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:23 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
I thik I prefer the Thomson/ Branagh version was.well. Love the sunniness. Too much expressng nner longing by playing on a.swing.set. I thought Denzell.was just OK. But Keanu Reeves.was at his.flat affect worst.

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
mitty
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:03 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 1359 Location: Way Down Yonder.......
A couple of million years ago, there was a sort of film fest here on 3rd Eye, involving science fiction. I purchased several and watched at the time.
The other night I remembered one in particular, 12 Monkeys....Bruce Willis, a very young Brad Pitt...

We loved it all over again. Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message
carrobin
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:29 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
I just read in today's paper that the SyFy network is working on a new adventure series based on "12 Monkeys," but no date was mentioned--just "upcoming."

I like Michael Keaton too--loved him in "Beetlejuice," and was impressed by his totally opposite grim performance as the head of the CIA in a miniseries a few years back. I'd like to see that again. I think it was just called "The Company," but I should check IMDb.

I also like Emma Thompson quite a lot. In fact, I have kind of girl crush on her. She's the main reason I don't like Branagh anymore--though I wouldn't mind seeing "Dead Again" again.
View user's profile Send private message
Syd
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 10:53 pm Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 12929 Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Grand Hotel is the best Joan Crawford performance I've seen. She's better than Garbo.

_________________
Rocky Laocoon foretold of Troy's doom, only to find snaky water. They pulled him in and Rocky can't swim. Now Rocky wishes he were an otter!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2250 of 2427
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 2249, 2250, 2251 ... 2425, 2426, 2427  Next
Post new topic

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum