Third Eye Film Society Forum Index
Author Message

<  Third Eye Film Forums  ~  The Lobby

gromit
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:32 am Reply with quote
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 9005 Location: Shanghai
Check out this ridiculous piece in the WSJ opining that Humanities, especially Literature, should be expunged from the university.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323823004578595803296798048.html

Quote:
Literature is too sacred to be taught. It needs only to be read ... Soon, if all goes well and literature at last disappears from the undergraduate curriculum


I don't know what lousy experience he had, but when I was an English major, the teaching methods, styles and such were quite varied. One prof even modelled his Modern Drama class on EST, or so he said.

And I can't imagine wading through Blake or Byron as far as I did without structure and guidance and other readers.
Those courses and others definitely advanced my appreciation and understanding, and pushed me much further into their work than I would have ventured on my own.

And of course, literature courses certainly don't preclude reading on one's own and I expect they make such self-learning/exploration more likely.

_________________
Killing your enemies, if it's done badly, increases their number.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
whiskeypriest
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:57 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
carrobin wrote:
Seems to me that HR people are generally lazy and/or swamped with applicants, and it's just easier for them to throw out all the non-college-grad resumes. My dad didn't even graduate from high school, but he ended up a millionaire (much to the surprise of my sister and me) because he was ambitious, hard-working, and a natural salesman. That doesn't get you far these days, unless you're extremely lucky (or inherit a business from your father--unfortunately, I'd be a lousy salesperson).
HR "people" don't screen resumes any more. Computer programs do.

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
carrobin
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:36 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
whiskeypriest wrote:
HR "people" don't screen resumes any more. Computer programs do.


So, they're lazy computer programmers.

That WSJ piece reminds me of my favorite movie, in which Alan Bates is a lecturer in English literature who has grown to hate his job (or at least his students). His comment to a girl who says she wants to teach sixth formers (high schoolers here): "Isn't that rather like being a fireman called to fight fires that are already out?" Actually, I agree with the WSJ guy on one item--reading in school can be a chore, and I still cringe when recalling the trudge through "David Copperfield" as a senior in high school. (Oddly, I also read "Moby Dick" in high school because a teacher I admired named it as his favorite book, and I liked it a lot more than I thought I would.) But in general, the concept of college without the humanities indicates to me a technical school geared toward working life, not a well-rounded mind.
View user's profile Send private message
bartist
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:33 am Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Apr 2010 Posts: 6941 Location: Black Hills
I used to be a teenager. I smoked some pot, got into some fights, and occasionally (painful to admit) made racist remarks. Where was the friendly neighborhood George Z. to come along, stalk me on a dark night, provoke a fight, and then give me the punishment I deserved? WHY AM I STILL HERE? I WAS CLEARLY A DRAG ON SOCIETY AND BETTER OFF DEAD.

I'm so sorry I'm here, Ted Nugent!

_________________
He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days.
View user's profile Send private message
Befade
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:09 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 3784 Location: AZ
It's too easy to pull a gun.. Do you know they make purses for women designed for conceal/carry?

Why didn't Zimmerman fight back? Because it was easier to just pull out a gun?

_________________
Lost in my own private I dunno.
View user's profile Send private message
Marc
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:58 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 19 May 2004 Posts: 8424
Racists and gun junkies are trying to demonize Trayvon Martin by saying he was using the Skittles and Arizona Tea to blend with codeine to make himself some drank or lean. So what? Were his plans for getting high justify being murdered? A white kid with drugs is a stoner. A Black kid with drugs is a goner.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jeremy
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:03 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6794 Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
I'm not sure the jury reached the wrong verdict in the context of the applicable laws...They all but sanction murder. I would argue that everything stems from 'your' perverted and pernicious relationship to guns...machines designed to kill people.

_________________
I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Befade
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:24 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 3784 Location: AZ
Jeremy..... I agree with you about the verdict and those laws and I'm not sure racism is part of this story. It's certainly not the whole story.

What definitely is key is that too many people in this country like to be armed.
With a gun handy the impulse to pull the trigger first and think....or not...later is too easy.

I taught a student who was egging cars with his friends after a night of working at a grocery store. Did one driver feel threatened? With a gun handy he solved the problem quickly. That was the last event in that 16 year olds life.

_________________
Lost in my own private I dunno.
View user's profile Send private message
jeremy
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:12 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6794 Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
I'm looking out of my window watching a constant stream of ships making their way along up and down the Huangpu. Running along the West bank to my left are a parade of early twentieth century stone buildings; the built-to-impress banks and commercial houses of Shanghai's Bund; a legacy of the concessions wrested from the Chinese by the Western powers in the proceeding eighty years. The British started it - I'm sure you've read your James Clavell – though America was also one of the ravenous wolves tearing at the carcass of a helpless China. I doubt one in ten Westerners could place the Opium Wars or The Boxer Rebellion, say, but the humiliations of that time still burn (and are nurtured) in the China.

Imposing as they are, these monuments of Western power are now stared down by the glass and concrete skyscrapers on the opposing East bank. With some justification, the Pudong financial district now boasts one of the world’s most iconic skylines. The symbolism is manifest and possibly deliberate.

What is young Johnny Zhang thinking as, like a May Day parade of old, he watches all that industrial production powering out to sea. Rightful destiny? Amongst other superlatives, Shanghai hosts the world biggest container port, it is building the world’s biggest airport, it is…I would suggest that we have not seen it’s like since a young Johnny Smith surveyed the fruits of Empire being unloaded in the docks of Victorian London.


Last edited by jeremy on Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total

_________________
I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Shane
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:43 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 1168 Location: Chicago
jeremy wrote:
I'm not sure the jury reached the wrong verdict in the context of the applicable laws...They all but sanction murder. I would argue that everything stems from 'your' perverted and pernicious relationship to guns...machines designed to kill people.


That I totally agree with you on Jer, I've had guns pulled on me by people who scared the hell out of me me just because they looked like they had no idea what they were doing.

_________________
I'd like to continue the argument we were having before. What was it about?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
carrobin
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:25 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
The euphemistically titled "Stand your ground law" is basically a legalized excuse to kill anybody you want, as long as you say he scared you. After all, unless there are witnesses, it's the killer's word against the dead guy's. (And now that law has been established in 21 states, I think. Not in NY, though.)

i've always been rather fascinated by Shanghai. Wasn't that the city where "Empire of the Sun" started?
View user's profile Send private message
marantzo
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:49 am Reply with quote
Guest
The USA has two extremes. One extreme is chock full of wonderful things that living or visiting there is a pleasure. The other extreme is a nightmare for the decent population of such a modern democratic country that has laws that belong in centuries past.
bartist
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:03 am Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Apr 2010 Posts: 6941 Location: Black Hills
carrobin wrote:
The euphemistically titled "Stand your ground law" is basically a legalized excuse to kill anybody you want, as long as you say he scared you. After all, unless there are witnesses, it's the killer's word against the dead guy's. (And now that law has been established in 21 states, I think. Not in NY, though.)


It's my hope that SYG laws will be overturned, as cases like this play out. It's so contrary to the spirit of the law that "self-defense" can be somehow divorced from the chain of events that lead to said act of self-defense. Apparently you can ignore dispatcher and law enforcement advice, get out of your truck and pursue someone on foot EVEN THOUGH YOU'VE ALREADY MARKED THEM AS A THREAT AND REPORTED IT TO POLICE, and then pursue until it escalates into a fistfight, and THEN USE A GUN when the fight doesn't go your way because somehow the fight itself lives in a magic bubble that has no relation to your prior culpable and negligent actions that led to said fight. Only this grotesque logic could allow a jury to NOT return a verdict of the "softer" form of manslaughter, i.e. culpable negligence. MS/CN doesn't require any knowledge of mens rea, i.e. no "ill will" need be established.

_________________
He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days.
View user's profile Send private message
bartist
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:30 am Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Apr 2010 Posts: 6941 Location: Black Hills
Here's an eye opener from the Tampa paper....

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/florida-stand-your-ground-law-yields-some-shocking-outcomes-depending-on/1233133

_________________
He was wise beyond his years, but only by a few days.
View user's profile Send private message
carrobin
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:34 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
Good journalism there. The moral seems to be, Don't go to Florida. Or any other state with that law on the books.
View user's profile Send private message

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 4168 of 4443
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 4167, 4168, 4169 ... 4441, 4442, 4443  Next
Post new topic

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum