Third Eye Film Society Forum Index
Author Message

<  Third Eye Film Forums  ~  Current Film Talk

lshap
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:29 am Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 12 May 2004 Posts: 4248 Location: Montreal
billyweeds wrote:
Joe Morgenstern in The Wall Street Journal:

"All of which brings us back to the question of expectations, and how Mr. Shyamalan keeps getting work. Eleven years ago he electrified the movie world with the emotional power and dramatic surprise of The Sixth Sense. He followed up with two flawed but intriguing features, Unbreakable and Signs. In the past eight years, though, his oeuvre has gone from bad (The Village) to worse (Lady in the Water) to worst (The Happening.) Purists might argue that his last film was less dreadful than his penultimate one, but the hallmarks were the same: stilted language, robotized acting, glacial pace, ponderous style, dramatic ineptitude and negligible energy. I never meant to make this review an exercise in career assassination, but I can't help thinking of all the lavishly talented filmmakers who have earned and never gotten a shot at big-budget success. What's the secret of this guy's failure?"


Unfortunately, it all comes down to numbers. M. Night built his rep on a strong debut film, and people have been buying tickets ever since, hoping against all logic that he'll recreate some of that dramatic flair. Studios will keep handing this guy a wad of cash to make films - ANY films, apparently - as long as we're stupid enough to keep seeing 'em.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
carrobin
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:35 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 7795 Location: NYC
"The Sixth Sense" really did have a surprise ending (regardless of those who say they saw it coming, it surprised most of us). I loved that film, and I liked "Signs" a lot. But I haven't seen any of his films since then, though I had hopes that "Airbender" would be a comeback for him. Then I saw the trailer. Too bad.
View user's profile Send private message
Syd
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:21 am Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 12940 Location: Norman, Oklahoma
The trailer made it look like an incoherent mess, so the trailer was apparently accurate. For me, Shlamayan jumped the shark about half an hour before the end of Signs and hasn't done a thing since I've been the least tempted to see. I liked The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable a lot.

_________________
Rocky Laocoon foretold of Troy's doom, only to find snaky water. They pulled him in and Rocky can't swim. Now Rocky wishes he were an otter!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
billyweeds
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:43 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
Syd wrote:
The trailer made it look like an incoherent mess, so the trailer was apparently accurate. For me, Shlamayan jumped the shark about half an hour before the end of Signs and hasn't done a thing since I've been the least tempted to see. I liked The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable a lot.


I thought the last part of Signs was very moving, and the last shot an absolute beauty. I agree that he hasn't done anything good since then.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Joe Vitus
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:22 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 14498 Location: Houston
I don't like his movies, but I will say that even when the plots are stupid (and I'd put Unbreakable up there with the worst of them), he does manage to create a mood. That alone is probably worth the ticket price for a number of people.

_________________
You've got a great brain. You should keep it in your head.

-Topher
View user's profile Send private message
lshap
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:49 am Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 12 May 2004 Posts: 4248 Location: Montreal
Shyamalan's films have followed the law of diminishing returns.

I'm with Carol on The Sixth Sense, a nicely-scripted story with genuine emotional heft, and an ending I still believe should be considered a classic.

Unbreakable had a clever premise and some marvelous scenes, but this time the ending was like The Sixth Sense's doppelganger, ruining it for me when it slipped into a silly comic book cliche.

Signs was beautifully directed and had some masterful scenes. Shyamalan seemed to be at his professional pinnacle as a director. But (from what I remember) more and more of his screenplay began to show the cracks of silly dialogue and clunky plot structure. Still, I'll concede that there was real intelligence lurking within the message.

Then the wheels began to come off. The Village had some well-directed scenes and individual shots, but everybody saw Shyamalan's shtick from a mile away and awaited his patented Surprise Ending, like we were watching a card trick performed by a birthday party magician.

I haven't seen one of his films since. Apparently, others have 'cause he's still making new ones.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
billyweeds
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:55 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
Signs had a wonderful ensemble cast. Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, and then-tiny but even-then-brilliant Abigail Breslin were all superb, and Night directed with a great deal of skill. It's amazing in a horrible, car-wreck sort of way what has happened to him since.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
whiskeypriest
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:59 am Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 6916 Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
billyweeds wrote:
Signs had a wonderful ensemble cast. Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, and then-tiny but even-then-brilliant Abigail Breslin were all superb, and Night directed with a great deal of skill. It's amazing in a horrible, car-wreck sort of way what has happened to him since.
My own guess for MSN's career: deals with Satan never end well. Except for Satan.

_________________
I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed?
View user's profile Send private message
lshap
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:54 pm Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 12 May 2004 Posts: 4248 Location: Montreal
Off to Stowe for the weekend. Was hoping to see a film at the beautifully quaint Stowe Cinema, but all that's playing is Twilight (zero interest), Toy Story (seen it) and Grown Ups (questioning how desperately I want to see a movie...)

I'm bringing a book.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Marc
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:36 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 19 May 2004 Posts: 8424
Quote:
Studios will keep handing this guy a wad of cash to make films


Not any more.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Marc
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:48 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 19 May 2004 Posts: 8424
Airbender will open with about $60 million. It cost $85 million. It may turn a profit but will not result in the planned on trilogy. It's a franchise killer.


Last edited by Marc on Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bartist
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:38 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Apr 2010 Posts: 6965 Location: Black Hills
Been on a trip the last few days, but news of the Night-mare has reached me here in Lawrence. Ebert gave it a half-star and a review so dripping with contempt that it's sort of amusing in a way. I have this image of Frank Langella, in "Dave," at the end...
View user's profile Send private message
billyweeds
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:31 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
whiskeypriest wrote:
billyweeds wrote:
Signs had a wonderful ensemble cast. Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, and then-tiny but even-then-brilliant Abigail Breslin were all superb, and Night directed with a great deal of skill. It's amazing in a horrible, car-wreck sort of way what has happened to him since.
My own guess for MSN's career: deals with Satan never end well. Except for Satan.


You and Lou Lumenick of The New York Post think alike. Here's what he said:

"If M. Night Shyamalan sold his soul to the devil for the success of The Sixth Sense, I think His Satanic Majesty has finally collected in full with The Last Airbender."
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
billyweeds
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:32 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 20618 Location: New York City
Marc wrote:
Airbender will open with about $60 million. It cost $85 million. It may turn a profit but will result in the planned on trilogy. It's a franchise killer.


I'm assuming you left out the word "not." Right?

I'm not so sure about the profit thing. Word of mouth on this flick is the worst I've seen in a long time. Fans of the anime Airbender are beyond disappointed. They are fighting mad.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Syd
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:04 pm Reply with quote
Site Admin Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 12940 Location: Norman, Oklahoma
The reviews are the most savage I've seen in a while.

_________________
Rocky Laocoon foretold of Troy's doom, only to find snaky water. They pulled him in and Rocky can't swim. Now Rocky wishes he were an otter!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 2416 of 3197
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 2415, 2416, 2417 ... 3195, 3196, 3197  Next
Post new topic

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum