Author |
Message |
|
marantzo |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:04 pm |
|
|
Guest
|
Marj, why would think Billy might not be interested in the subject matter of a movie about Charlie Chaplin? It's not like he's a Gen Xer or something.
On a related topic., one of the channels here tends to show old B/W movies, and silents, when they aren't broadcasting some Spanish programmes that I've never been able to understand. Laurel and Hardy, Abbot and Costello, old B/W dramas etc. The last couple of weeks they have been showing hours of Chaplin shorts back to back and features like The Gold Rush. These are usually through the late night and when I wake up in the middle of the night (which is always) I tune into this channel first. Often get lucky and have seen among other things, Chaplin shorts which I watch until I fall asleep again. A very interesting channel. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
marantzo |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:12 pm |
|
|
Guest
|
Having just read Billy's last post, yeah, see it, it's a good movie. Not a borefest as Attenborough's tend to be. I saw Gandhi long after it's release and wondered what all the fuss was about. Too long and too dull. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Syd |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:33 pm |
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 12921
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
|
"An Education" and "Crazy Heart" are both showing in Norman starting Friday. No sign of single or serious men. |
_________________ I had a love and my love was true but I lost my love to the yabba dabba doo, --The Flintstone Lament |
|
Back to top |
|
carrobin |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:37 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 7795
Location: NYC
|
We saw "Gandhi" for our film class at 8:30 in the morning, which meant I had to be at the Ziegfeld Theatre at 7:30. I figured maybe that's why I was getting sleepy by the end of the film, but I didn't really find it boring. Sir Richard "Dickie" Attenborough was there to talk about it, and the main thing I remember was that some woman had told him to use "a moving light" to represent Gandhi rather than a mere human actor, and he told her crisply that "I'm not making a film about Tinkerbell." |
|
|
Back to top |
|
whiskeypriest |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:39 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 6916
Location: "It's a Dry Heat."
|
carrobin wrote: We saw "Gandhi" for our film class at 8:30 in the morning, which meant I had to be at the Ziegfeld Theatre at 7:30. I figured maybe that's why I was getting sleepy by the end of the film, but I didn't really find it boring. Sir Richard "Dickie" Attenborough was there to talk about it, and the main thing I remember was that some woman had told him to use "a moving light" to represent Gandhi rather than a mere human actor, and he told her crisply that "I'm not making a film about Tinkerbell." Actually, that might of been more interesting than the stolid, respectful and lifeless thing he made instead. |
_________________ I ask you, Velvel, as a rational man, which of us is possessed? |
|
Back to top |
|
jeremy |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:37 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6794
Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
|
The best thing about Sherlock Holmes was the two leads and their on-screen chemistry. I have no idea if they got on off-screen.
Rober Downey Jr has rightly been praised for his steam-punk, portrayal of the eponymous detective, but I also think Jude Law's understated Watson was excellent. Jude Law is always better in a support role. Incidentally, his characterisation of Watson, was much more in keeping with the uncompromising military man of Conan Doyle's writings than the amiable duffer that has become the popular image.
I would have liked more deductive reasoning and less action; a credible plot and a different lead actress; but those quibbles aside, the film was still an enjoyable diversion. |
_________________ I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
jeremy |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:39 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6794
Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
|
Richard Attenborough is too nice to be a good director. |
_________________ I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
marantzo |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:13 pm |
|
|
Guest
|
jeremy wrote: Richard Attenborough is too nice to be a good director.
You might have a good point there. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Marj |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:23 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 10497
Location: Manhattan
|
Gary: Billy answered for me. I know he doesn't like Attenborough. Frankly, neither do I. And the film his long and a very typical biopic with one exception: Downey Jr.'s performance.
And I think Jeremy has a point. Attenborough may indeed be too nice to be a director. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
carrobin |
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:40 pm |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 7795
Location: NYC
|
I've always liked Attenborough as an actor (after all, "The Great Escape" is one of my top five favorite films). But as a director he usually leans toward the pretentious. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
jeremy |
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:08 am |
|
|
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6794
Location: Derby, England and Hamilton, New Zealand (yes they are about 12,000 miles apart)
|
David Attenborough is a grande dame [sic] of British cinema and numbered among the great and good. Along with the likes of Alan Bennet and Stephen Fry, he generates the type of fussy affection that can lead to someone being labelled a national institution. Much like his films, he is amiable, worthy and not a little earnest. Though normally seen as virtues rather than faults, his instinct to be inclusive, his desire to be liked and his inability to see the worst in people, do not make for lean or edgy filmmaking.
He is also a Chelsea supporter.
[Correction: Richard not David...damn!] |
Last edited by jeremy on Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:56 pm; edited 1 time in total _________________ I am angry, I am ill, and I'm as ugly as sin.
My irritability keeps me alive and kicking.
I know the meaning of life, it doesn't help me a bit.
I know beauty and I know a good thing when I see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
chillywilly |
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:21 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 8251
Location: Salt Lake City
|
billyweeds wrote: Haven't seen The Soloist, though I fear I might have to after the recent raves on this forum, but Less Than Zero remains my favorite Downey, with Iron Man an incredibly close second.
If it wasn't for The Soloist, Iron Man - which was my favorite film of 2008 - would have been in that top 3 list.
I need to watch Less Than Zero again. A good movie with a great screenplay by Brett Easton Ellis and a superb RDJ performance. |
_________________ Chilly
"If you should die before me / Ask if you could bring a friend" |
|
Back to top |
|
Melody |
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:15 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 2242
Location: TX
|
I haven't seen Chaplin, either, and now I really want to. Thanks for the reminder!
See The Soloist sometime for another great RDJ performance. Good screenplay, too. |
_________________ My heart told my head: This time, no. |
|
Back to top |
|
ehle64 |
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:23 am |
|
|
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 7149
Location: NYC; US&A
|
uhm, , i remember Chaplin being awesome.
i also remember da Weeds disliking Home for the Holidays (I love it, his performanace (which i feel to be me)) plus the WHOLE cast.
anywho -- i couldn't stand Iron Man, so what do I knkow? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
Syd |
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:34 am |
|
|
Site Admin
Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 12921
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
|
jeremy wrote: David Attenborough is a grande dame [sic] of British cinema and numbered among the great and good. Along with the likes of Alan Bennet and Stephen Fry, he generates the type of fussy affection that can lead to someone being labelled a national institution. Much like his films, he is amiable, worthy and not a little earnest. Though normally seen as virtues rather than faults, his instinct to be inclusive, his desire to be liked and his inability to see the worst in people, do not make for lean or edgy filmmaking.
He is also a Chelsea supporter.
David should be a national institution. Life on Earth The Living Planet, The Life of Mammals, etc., are classics of natural history. I much prefer him to Richard. |
_________________ I had a love and my love was true but I lost my love to the yabba dabba doo, --The Flintstone Lament |
|
Back to top |
|
|